Category: League Business

2014 DynaBowl Post Season Performance Analysis – Part 1

I’ve been having a look at all the performance data from all meaningful weeks of the DynaBowl season for all players on the main rosters (so not including IR or taxi squads).

It’s not really that meaningful to look at the total points of players not started as some of those will be classified as out, while others will specifically be back-ups (see Jimmy Garropolo) so wouldn’t be expected to score anything.

PLOB isn’t looked at, but is examined on the MFL website in the Power Ranking data. There might be something that can be done with the raw data and I’ll hand that over to anyone else who wants to have a go.

I’m looking at scoring by position groups, consistency of scoring, and high scoring performances that were left on the bench (many of which are just unlucky because they come from players you wouldn’t think of starting – not all of them though). There may be a few other bits and pieces that get included as I follow some loose ends…

So, to start off, a couple of tables of data that have kind of been covered in the awards. All of these are sorted by the full season total points. First up, total points for all positions:

Max Score Min Score Regular Season Total Playoff Total Full Season Total
DynaForOne Firebirds 288.010 125.265 2397.800 708.325 3106.125
Kelkowski Don’t Play By No Dyna Rules 262.585 136.100 2494.355 524.020 3018.375
Dynasore Losers 245.325 151.545 2478.930 533.880 3012.810
Champions of the Sun 269.140 134.390 2392.665 597.115 2989.780
Dyna Hard 255.375 139.140 2396.135 526.215 2922.350
Dynablaster Bombermen 238.910 140.265 2297.190 548.155 2845.345
Tamworth Two 247.890 126.985 2388.085 419.890 2807.975
Here Comes The Brees 224.050 109.585 2258.885 422.400 2681.285
The 4th Dynmension: Dynasty of Sadness 207.300 104.220 2008.795 535.495 2544.290
East Flanders Flahutes 206.280 123.100 2138.915 391.845 2530.760

Next up, the same again, but for offense only:

Max Score Min Score Regular Season Total Playoff Total Full Season Total
DynaForOne Firebirds 150.660 77.480 1435.300 411.500 1846.800
Kelkowski Don’t Play By No Dyna Rules 145.685 84.050 1405.580 329.570 1735.150
Dynasore Losers 162.430 57.670 1376.835 256.705 1633.540
Champions of the Sun 140.365 64.900 1248.565 292.240 1540.805
Dynablaster Bombermen 126.420 61.940 1177.490 277.380 1454.870
Dyna Hard 134.485 54.440 1214.635 239.715 1454.350
Tamworth Two 136.440 68.200 1188.360 253.450 1441.810
The 4th Dynmension: Dynasty of Sadness 134.150 42.845 1035.420 297.420 1332.840
East Flanders Flahutes 120.380 51.050 1083.290 202.820 1286.110
Here Comes The Brees 106.920 51.280 1065.560 205.300 1270.860

Now defence:

Max Score Min Score Regular Season Total Playoff Total Full Season Total
Champions of the Sun 129.250 30.000 1012.150 250.450 1262.600
Dyna Hard 113.500 33.750 1006.150 236.350 1242.500
Dynablaster Bombermen 130.950 47.900 956.200 235.100 1191.300
Dynasore Losers 117.300 54.500 932.650 249.050 1181.700
Tamworth Two 111.300 27.000 1043.150 138.000 1181.150
Here Comes The Brees 124.450 39.850 996.850 173.100 1169.950
Kelkowski Don’t Play By No Dyna Rules 143.600 36.500 935.950 153.750 1089.700
DynaForOne Firebirds 126.550 26.750 808.350 252.500 1060.850
East Flanders Flahutes 94.250 32.250 871.300 170.100 1041.400
The 4th Dynmension: Dynasty of Sadness 84.950 35.000 797.575 199.050 996.625

And finally special teams (punters and kickers only):

Max Score Min Score Regular Season Total Playoff Total Full Season Total
Here Comes The Brees 21.200 9.575 196.475 44.000 240.475
Dyna Hard 21.300 7.900 175.350 50.150 225.500
The 4th Dynmension: Dynasty of Sadness 22.725 6.000 175.800 39.025 214.825
East Flanders Flahutes 20.475 1.650 184.325 18.925 203.250
Dynablaster Bombermen 18.225 4.700 163.500 35.675 199.175
DynaForOne Firebirds 18.025 4.000 154.150 44.325 198.475
Dynasore Losers 18.100 3.300 169.445 28.125 197.570
Kelkowski Don’t Play By No Dyna Rules 19.675 4.900 152.825 40.700 193.525
Champions of the Sun 19.975 3.950 131.950 54.425 186.375
Tamworth Two 18.400 6.940 156.575 28.440 185.015

I’ve not really got anything to say about that. I suppose the key thing is how Neil pulled out all the stops in the playoffs, destroying everything in his path.

What I find interesting, though, is the amount of variation from one week to the next. I mean, we know there’s a fair amount of variation in fantasy football, but only 3 teams had less than 100 points between their max and min scores during the 16 weeks. That seems massive.

So how do we rate consistency? I’m going to bastardise a method of statistical evaluation to try to provide a suitable indicator. What I’ve done is look at each team’s weekly score and take the difference between that and their average score. This number is then squared, which means that the higher the difference from the average, the number generated is exponentially higher.

Make sense? No? OK, an example – in week one DynaForOne scored 125.265 points. The season average was 194.133 so the difference is 68.868. 68.868 squared is 4742.78. That is a high consistency score because the weekly score was a long way from the average score.

Of course, consistency is not always bad. The same calculation for week 16 shows DynaForOne (DFO) have a consistency score of 8812.93. That week DFO scored the highest score of any team in any week of the season.

Funnily enough, these two performance, week 1 and week 16 for DFO, are the 1st and 6th least consistent performances of the season (ie with the greatest variation from the team’s weekly average). DFO also has the 7th least consistent score (week 4, another low score).

What I have done to rank the consistency is take the average of all the weeks consistency ratings and square root them. This gives us a number which probably has little meaning beyond “the lower the number the more consistent the team was over the season”.

Team Max Consistency Score Min Consistency Score Season (Root Ave) Consistency Total Points
East Flanders Flahutes 2314.33 0.20 23.72 2530.76
Dynasore Losers 3251.78 0.85 24.84 3012.81
Dyna Hard 5289.38 0.03 26.60 2922.35
Kelkowski Don’t Play By No Dyna Rules 5466.62 4.62 28.26 3018.38
Dynablaster Bombermen 3730.27 14.30 29.90 2845.35
The 4th Dynmension: Dynasty of Sadness 3002.83 5.39 30.79 2544.29
Here Comes The Brees 3363.46 2.58 30.99 2681.29
Tamworth Two 5240.54 1.90 34.64 2807.98
Champions of the Sun 6769.79 0.86 39.28 2989.78
DynaForOne Firebirds 8812.93 1.67 39.34 3106.13

So what’s the value in consistency? I have no idea. The top two most consistent teams are the least successful and the third most successful (by total points) so it’s difficult to say you do or don’t want to be consistent. The least consistent team won the league.

However, let’s look at DFO more closely. After week 4, DFO only scored below 190 points once. Those first 4 weeks really seemed to come from a different team. Let’s also ignore week 16, because that massive haul of 288 points was a real outlier. So, for weeks 5-15, how consistent was DFO?

For those 11 weeks, this is what those stats look like:

Team Max Consistency Score Min Consistency Score Season (Root Ave) Consistency
DynaForOne Firebirds 1643.38 7.14 17.57

From least consistent to most.

I think the main thing is that if you score a lot of points, it’s really handy if you can do it consistently. Not that it helped Dyna Hard, of course.

So, given we’ve established that it’s pretty meaningless, it’s time to look at it in a bit more depth…

Offensive consistency!

Team Max Consistency Score Min Consistency Score Season (Root Ave) Consistency Total Points
Here Comes The Brees 792.35 1.06 16.83 1270.86
East Flanders Flahutes 1599.85 0.25 17.07 1286.11
Kelkowski Don’t Play By No Dyna Rules 1386.68 2.18 17.70 1735.15
Champions of the Sun 1941.70 0.00 17.95 1540.81
Dynablaster Bombermen 1259.58 3.50 18.11 1454.87
Tamworth Two 2146.18 5.89 19.80 1441.81
DynaForOne Firebirds 1439.82 0.50 21.41 1846.8
The 4th Dynmension: Dynasty of Sadness 2585.47 0.58 22.27 1332.84
Dyna Hard 1899.92 2.38 23.39 1454.35
Dynasore Losers 3640.16 0.08 29.59 1633.54

What I find interesting is that Dynasore Losers and Dyna Hard were 2nd and 3rd in overall consistency but are 9th and 10th in offensive consistency. We’ll look at defensive consistency in a moment, but this suggests (to me) that they will be low there too, and that the overall consistency may be down to chance (mismatching high and low offensive and defensive scoring).

As for DFO… for those 11 weeks, there again jumped to the top of the consistency rankings, though it’s not quite as clear cut…

Team Max Consistency Score Min Consistency Score Season (Root Ave) Consistency
DynaForOne Firebirds 485.20 536.72 16.46

Now to defense!

Team Max Consistency Score Min Consistency Score Season (Root Ave) Consistency Total Points
The 4th Dynmension: Dynasty of Sadness 744.69 0.40 13.03 996.625
Dynasore Losers 1887.36 1.94 15.22 1181.7
East Flanders Flahutes 1078.30 14.16 19.78 1041.4
Here Comes The Brees 2634.58 3.53 21.45 1169.95
Tamworth Two 2192.29 0.10 21.95 1181.15
Dyna Hard 1927.76 3.63 22.42 1242.5
DynaForOne Firebirds 3629.69 4.19 22.93 1060.85
Dynablaster Bombermen 3191.54 1.67 22.95 1191.3
Kelkowski Don’t Play By No Dyna Rules 5699.31 1.94 24.15 1089.7
Champions of the Sun 2533.86 90.49 29.78 1262.6

I was wrong! Dynasore Losers had the second most consistent defence. Well done them. Dyna Hard were mid-table.

And DFO? Again, for those 11 weeks, they shot to the top of the charts…

Team Max Consistency Score Min Consistency Score Season (Root Ave) Consistency
DynaForOne Firebirds 241.03 505.13 12.25

What’s that? Special teams? You want to look at special teams consistency? OK. It’s widely thought of as the most random of all areas, though because it’s only 2 players and not much scoring, the numbers should all be much lower. Let’s see what those numbers say…

Team Max Consistency Score Min Consistency Score Season (Root Ave) Consistency Total Points
Dynablaster Bombermen 60.04 0.03 3.24 199.175
Dynasore Losers 81.87 0.07 3.29 197.57
Dyna Hard 51.93 0.32 3.53 225.5
The 4th Dynmension: Dynasty of Sadness 86.46 0.00 3.60 214.825
Tamworth Two 46.74 0.13 3.70 185.015
DynaForOne Firebirds 70.64 0.91 3.71 198.475
Here Comes The Brees 38.07 0.94 4.12 240.475
Kelkowski Don’t Play By No Dyna Rules 57.45 1.45 4.58 193.525
Champions of the Sun 69.33 0.39 4.87 186.375
East Flanders Flahutes 122.17 0.01 5.07 203.25

I’m not looking at DFO for that 11 week period. It’s meaningless. MEANINGLESS I tell you.

Still, at least the Bombermen finished at the top of one of these…

Now, I promised you a look at scoring by position and high scoring players on the bench… those will follow in a a future post (or posts). This is enough to start with, isn’t it?

Proposed Scoring Changes for 2015

Mr Maxwell H Cubberley has contributed a suggestion for amendments to the scoring for the DynaBowl Fantasy Football Championships 2015 onwards. If you would care to read his words, they will follow shortly.

Now, in fact.

Binning the Big Plays: Proposed Scoring Changes for 2015

Big Plays

As anyone who has been on the receiving end of an 80 yard pick 6 or a double strip-sack game from a DE will likely tell you about (at length) the Dynabowl IDP game is currently dominated by big plays.    Each INT or FF is worth 10 points, each defensive TD is worth 6 points and all return yards on fumbles and interceptions are valued at 0.1 per 1 [NB – only INT yards are counted – ed].  The aforementioned 80 yard pick 6 currently nets your CB 24 points for that one play.  This is particularly painful as INTs are often quite random and not much to do with particularly good play from a CB or S.  Meanwhile, a strip-sack is worth 15 points (16 if you’re a DT) and that’s not including the possibility of your strip-sacker recovering it (3 more points) and returning it for a TD.  Somewhere lurking out there is a 34 point strip-sack, 100 yard fumble recovery TD.  Probably for JJ Watt.  I’m surprised he hasn’t done it already.

Bearing this in mind there have been several solutions proposed to try and even out some of the scoring.  Below are the proposed rule changes for 2015:

  1. The point return for INTs and FFs to be reduced from 10 to 6 for all players
  2. The points for INT and FF recovery yards to be reduced to the same as punt return yards (0.05 per 1 rather than 0.1 per 1)
  3. The points for passes defended (possibly a more accurate gauge of defensive backs’ skills) to be increased from 2 to 3 for CBs and Ss and 1 to 2 for everyone else.

Evening Out the Linebackers

Anyone who based their pre-draft rankings of LBs on those suggested by popular IDP sites might be slightly confused as to why their LB corps isn’t producing as expected.  This is because most IDP leagues are tackle-based, giving plenty of points for tackles and less for sacks, FFs and INTs.  Our league is a big play league, focussed on those game-changing moments and the players who make them.  For all that there seems to be too much of a disparity between middle linebackers (those players for whom tackling is their bread-and-butter) and outside linebackers (more of the edge rushers looking to hit the QB in the backfield).  With the tackle points as low as they are it’s difficult for all but the most elite MLBs to compete with their outside compatriots.

With that in mind, a second rule change has been proposed, to slightly increase the points scored by solo tackles.  The idea is not to swing the league from a big play league to a tackle-heavy league, but just to allow a few more MLBs to ease towards the top of the LB rankings and even the distribution out a little.  The proposed change is:

  1. Points for solo tackles (not assists) to be increased from 0.5 points per tackle to 0.75 points per tackle.

Over the course of a 100 solo tackle season (a very good but not outstanding season) that equates to 25 more points.

The Difference

To try and illustrate what difference this would make I’ve crunched it all into MFL and can present the difference as it would have pertained to the 2013 season.  I’ll compare both the new points system and the old points system to look for the difference.

Top 100 Breakdown

Here is a breakdown of the top 100 scorers in 2013 by position.  This should show how the points changes affect the make-up of the top bracket of scorers.

Position Top 100 Players – Old Points Top 100 Players – New Points
QB 26 26
RB 20 19
WR 21 20
TE 3 3
PK 0 0
PN 0 0
DT 4 4
DE 4 3
LB 16 20
CB 3 2
S 3 3

This indicates a very slight increase in the value of LBs (though 2 of the additional 4 were numbers 99 and 100 in the top 100).

To look at the IDP players in more detail, I’ll breakdown just the top 100 defensive players.

Position Top 100 IDPs – Old Points Top 100 IDPs – New Points
DT 11 10
DE 18 16
LB 38 39
CB 17 21
S 16 14

Again, the changes seem fairly minimal in terms of the split amongst the positions.  Going deeper, CBs receive a bit of a boost and Ss a small hit (presumably due to a higher number of pass defence opportunities than Ss) but the broad make up is the same.

The indication is that these changes don’t make a huge difference to the proportional make-up of the overall top 100 and the IDP top 100.  They shouldn’t cause one position to become more valuable going forward than it was at the draft.

Specific Player Value

There are still two checks to make.  The first is specific player value.  Sure, maybe CBs as a whole aren’t more valuable but what if the top 10 CBs under the new points are 10 completely different players?  What if the #1 DT is now the #10?  Below is the top 10 at each defensive position under the new points and the old.  Their position in the opposite points scoring system is also included for reference.

Defensive Tackle Position – Old Pts Position – New Pts Shift
Kyle Williams, BUF 1 (204.5) 1 (212) = (+7.5)
Gerald McCoy, TBB 2 (180.25) 2 (193.6) = (+13.35)
Nick Fairley, DET 3 (172) 3 (171.2) = (-0.8)
Ndamukong Suh, DET 4 (152) 4 (163) = (+11)
Marcell Dareus, BUF 5 (134) 5 (144.25) = (+10.25)
Cullen Jenkins, NYG 6 (122) 10 (120.25) -4 (-1.75)
Sen’Derrick Marks, JAX 7 (118.25) 6 (126) +1 (+7.75)
Jared Odrick, MIA 7 (118.25) 7 (124.75) = (+6.5)
Clinton McDonald, SEA 9 (115.8) 11 (118.4) -2 (+2.6)
Michael Brockers, STL 10 (115) 9 (120.5) +1 (+5.5)
Kendall Langford, STL 12 (109.25) 8 (122.25) +4 (+13)

No huge changes here which would be expected as DTs don’t have as many FFs as LBs and DEs and rarely catch INTs.  Any loss of points from FFs seems to have been compensated for with the tackle bump with most coming out a few points better over the course of the season.  Although Cullen Jenkins drops 4 places in the ranks he actually only ends up 1.75 points down under the new points.

Defensive End Position – Old Pts Position – New Pts Shift
Robert Quinn, STL 1 (250.75) 1 (237.9) = (-12.85)
JJ Watt, HOU 2 (191.75) 2 (199) = (+7.25)
Justin Tuck, NYG 3 (145) 4 (147.15) -1 (+2.15)
Greg Hardy, CAR 4 (144.5) 3 (151.25) +1 (+6.75)
Muhammed Wilkerson, NYJ 5 (138.85) 8 (140.3) -3 (+1.45)
Cameron Jordan, NOS 6 (138) 7 (142.55) -1 (+4.55)
Chandler Jones, NEP 7 (137.25) 6 (143.25) +1 (+6)
Calais Campbell, ARI 8 (133.5) 5 (146.85) +3 (+13.35)
Carlos Dunlap, CIN 9 (132.75) 10 (134.6) -1 (+1.85)
Jared Allen, MIN 10 (130.75) 9 (137) +1 (+6.25)

Like DT, DE doesn’t show too many major shifts here.  The same 10 players make up the top 10 under both the new and the old systems and although there is some shuffling of positions (Wilkerson and Campbell particularly) the actual season ending point totals don’t shift drastically with most seeing an increase of 1 to 7 and only sack-machine Robert Quinn seeing a reduction.

Because we all start 3 or 4 LBs I’ll compare the top 20 at this position.  I’ve also noted (where I can) when the player is an MLB or an OLB (we should be looking for MLBs to move up the rankings in the new points).

Linebacker Position – Old Pts Position – New Pts Shift
Robert Mathis, IND – OLB 1 (242) 3 (221.75) -2 (-20.25)
Lavonte David, TBB – MLB 2 (232.95) 1 (235.85) +1 (+1.9)
Karlos Dansby, ARI – MLB 3 (199.05) 2 (223.65) +1 (+24.6)
Navorro Bowman, SF – MLB 4 (198.55) 4 (208.4) = (+9.85)
Jerell Freeman, IND – MLB 5 (185.05) 5 (180.35) = (-4.7)
Alec Ogletree, STL – OLB 6 (173.55) 8 (173.4) -2 (-0.15)
Tamba Hali, KCC – OLB 7 (167.75) 12 (158.3) -5 (-9.45)
Daryl Smith, BAL – MLB 8 (165.1) 6 (176.3) +2 (+11.2)
Kiko Alonso, BUF – MLB 9 (158.3) 10 (163.8) -1 (+5.5)
John Abraham, ARI – OLB 10 (155.5) 18 (150.25) -8 (-5.25)
DeAndre Levy, DET – MLB 11 (155.1) 11 (163.55) = (+8.45)
Paul Posluszny, JAX – MLB 12 (152.4) 7 (176.2) +5 (+23.8)
Mychal Kendricks, PHI – MLB 13 (152.25) 13 (156.55) = (+4.3)
Danny Trevathan, DEN – MLB 14 (149.9) 15 (155.45) -1 (+5.55)
Vontaze Burfict, CIN – MLB 15 (144.95) 9 (173.25) +6 (+23.3)
Nick Roach, OAK – OLB 16 (144.75) 20 (148.25) -4 (+3.5)
Ryan Kerrigan, WAS – OLB 17 (143.75) 22 (142.5) -5 (-1.25)
Luke Kuechly, CAR – MLB 18 (142.55) 16 (155.15) +2 (+12.6)
Brian Orakpo, WAS – OLB 19 (136.65) 21 (145.95) -2 (+9.3)
Thomas Davis, CAR – OLB 20 (136) 17 (153.15) +3 (+17.15)
Derrick Johnson, KCC – MLB 21 (134.4) 14 (155.5) +7 (+21.1)
DeMeco Ryans, PHI – MLB 25 (126.85) 19 (149.05) +6 (+22.2)

The change to the points can clearly be seen here with OLBs that rack up pressures and FFs (e.g. Mathis, Hali, Abraham) taking a hit and prime tacklers (e.g. Posluszny, Dansby, Burfict) getting a significant boost.  Although this was the desired effect the fact that, even in the old system, 12 of the top 20 LBs were MLBs already does seem to call into question the need for this change.  The 2014 stats paint a picture of a system that heavily favours OLBs but that could be a result of the number of injuries to or change in situations of big scoring MLBs.

I’ll show the CB and S tables back to back as I would expect both to be affected similarly by this change.

Corner Back Position – Old Pts Position – New Pts Shift
Brandon Boykin, PHI 1 (159.475) 3 (147.675) -2 (-11.8)
DeAngelo Hall, WAS 2 (157.65) 1 (158.2) +1 (+1.55)
Richard Sherman, SEA 3 (151.95) 5 (139.2) -2 (-12.75)
Alterraun Verner, TEN 4 (142.275) 2 (154.575) +2 (+12.3)
Tim Jennings, CHI 5 (138.1) 8 (133.55) -3 (-4.55)
Tramon Williams, GBP 6 (135.5) 4 (141.25) +2 (+5.75)
Captain Munnerlyn, CAR 7 (130.85) 6 (138.55) +1 (+7.7)
Corey Graham, BUF 8 (121.55) 14 (124.9) -6 (+3.35)
Logan Ryan, NEP 9 (119.7) 32 (108.85) -23 (-10.85)
Adam Jones, CIN 10 (118.9) 12 (126.8) -2 (+7.9)
Lardarius Webb, BAL 19 (106.8) 7 (136.6) +12 (+29.8)
Leodis McKelvin, BUF 26 (101.6) 9 (128.35) +17 (+26.75)
Joe Haden, CLE 12 (115.95) 10 (127.85) +2 (+11.9)
Safety Position – Old Pts Position – New Pts Shift
Eric Berry, KCC 1 (165.65) 1 (170.65) = (+5)
Troy Polamalu, PIT 2 (161.35) 3 (155.05) -1 (-6.3)
Antrel Rolle, NYG 3 (160.8) 2 (163) +1 (+2.2)
Michael Mitchell, CAR 4 (141.55) 9 (135.9) -5 (-5.65)
William Moore, ATL 5 (139.35) 7 (138.05) -2 (+1.3)
Tashaun Gipson, CLE 6 (137.55) 6 (138.15) = (+0.6)
Earl Thomas, SEA 7 (130.85) 11 (128.95) -4 (-1.9)
TJ Ward. CLE 8 (126.95) 4 (144.4) +4 (+17.45)
Barry Church, DAL 9 (126.5) 5 (144.1) +4 (+17.6)
James Ihedigbo, BAL 10 (123.15) 10 (130.7) = (+7.55)
Eric Weddle, SDC 12 (118.75) 8 (136.55) +4 (+17.8)

As you can see the changes are much more impactful on the CB position than the S position.  At CB there are big positive swings for the likes of Webb (2 INT, 23 passes defended) and McKelvin (1 INT and 20 PD) and big negative swings for such as Sherman (8 INT and 6 PD) and Ryan (5 INT and 10 PD).  This is what you’d expect from the rules.  It’s also worth noting that although Logan Ryan lost 23 ranks, he actually only scored 10.85 points less under the new points.  In general, the points seem to bunch CBs a bit more towards the top which I think reflects the reduced wild-card factor of INTs over steady pass defending.

It is worth mentioning, at this point, that CB is an incredibly volatile position from year-to-year anyway.  None of last year’s top 10 CBs are in this year’s current top 10 CBs.  In fact, only Adam Jones and Alterraun Verner are even in this year’s top 32 CBs.

Oddly, at Safety the changes are nowhere near as large.  Possibly this is a result of Safeties having more all-round play capability or maybe it’s a reflection of the fact that Safety interceptions are more skill-based.  At any rate, there are a few changes, notably bumps for TJ Ward and Barry Church (both had a notably higher number of solo tackles than those around them), but nothing too major.

Summary of Findings

It’s noticeable, looking through the week-by-week performances of players, that these changes, overall, raise the floor and lower the ceiling of IDP production.  What was a 40 point game is often now a 30 point game and what was a 3 point game is now a 5 point game.  The average points per game and total season points, in general, trends slightly upwards with the bottom-end of players brought a bit closer to the top-end whilst still keeping elite levels of performance for top players.

Some players whose games are built around big plays have taken something of a hit but, in most cases, this is not hugely significant and shows more in comparative score rankings than in actual point production.  The reduction of big plays and increase in passes defended seems to have had the desired effect, reducing scoring ceilings but not overall scores and not reducing the CB and S points-scoring.  Although the big changes at CB look scary, as mentioned above, the position tends to turn over a lot from year-to-year anyway.  If anything, these new changes may make the position more reliable as tackle numbers and pass defence numbers are more consistent year to year than INTs and FFs.

The question of the increase in points for tackles is hazier.  The proportion of MLBs and OLBs in the top ranks of the position could be a natural seasonal fluctuation.  It doesn’t make a massive difference to the overall points-scoring at the LB position (with only the same small upward trend seen in every position).  The new system produces a better balance between very steady LBs with big tackle production and those who get sacks, FFs and INTs.  In the current system, a player has to make 10 solo tackles to score the equivalent of a sack.  In the new system they have to make 7.  The latter seems more in line to me with what one would consider a ‘good game’ but everyone can make their own mind up.

If you want me to produce more information to look at this just ask.

Replacement Level: Week 9

So this week, Chris Braithwaite, GM of the Dyna Hards, has taken on the baton of The Replacements, and a bang up job he’s done too. Except for not having scored David’s efforts from week 7. Of course, you could lay that all on Neil Hawke of the DynaForOne Firebirds who failed to produce anything for week 8. But hey, Chris is here now, so let’s blame him eh? Anyway… on with Chris’ Replacements…

Player Projection
QB Mike Glennon 14.560
HB Donald Brown 3.925
HB Roy Helu 6.000
WR Stevie Johnson 4.200
WR Jarius Wright 4.200
WR Jacoby Jones 3.375
WR Philly Brown 3.200
TE Chase Ford 3.425
TE Jacob Tamme 1.400
K Cairo Santos 7.400
P Brad Wing 0
DT Ian Williams 0.500
DE Ray McDonald 1
DE Jason Hatcher 1
LB Perry Riley 2.5
LB Bruce Irvin 1.5
LB Jabaal Sheard 0.5
LB Vincent Rey 2
CB Adam Jones 5.575
CB Sean Smith 3.550
S Dashon Goldson 2
S Husain Abdullah 4.025
Total 75.835

 

QB

The options are Mike Glennon or no one. Hey Lovie, now I know how you feel. Honestly, what I’d give for Kyle Orton or something.

 

RB

Donald Brown has a chance to be sneaky effective as the steady veteran hand behind Branden Oliver, so he could grab a bit of yardage on receptions and as a change of pace (that change being down to “no pace”.)

 

Roy Helu has been good for about 40 to 50 yards a game combined for most of the season, and there’s always a chance for a TD I guess, so he’s option 2. The Vikings D is mediocre against the run and terrible defending passes to RBs, so he might be able to break a couple of mediocre plays.

 

I’d normally play 3 RBs, but honestly there are absolutely no other options.

 

WR

Alas, pickings are still fairly slim at WR. Stevie Johnson is a must play. Washington has been pretty dreadful against the pass most weeks, so Jarius Wright is a potentially good play, so he can slot in. Football Outsiders reckons that Pittsburgh have been pretty dreadful against #3 WRs, so Jacoby Jones might be able to take advantage there. Maybe it’ll be another shootout. And for my number 4, I fancy a girl called Philly, so I’m taking Philly Brown of the Panthers. Look, that can’t be any worse logic than any of the other picks.

 

TE

The pickings at RB are so ridiculously slim I have to drop down to TEs and hope for some short TDs. Let’s go back to the “Washington sucks” well (it is a deep well) and grab Chase Ford of the Vikings as my #1 guy, despite his injury. He looks like the only chap with a chance at being actually useful, so the other guy is gonna have to be a hope for a 1 catch, 1 yard, 1 TD line. That is Jacob Tamme’s career, so yep, that’s happening.

 

K

Cairo Santos. Look, he’s Brazilian, his name is a capital city and he’s playing the Jets at home. Lets not overthink this.

 

P

Where MFL doesn’t even bother to make projections. My rule has always been “pick the guy with the worst offence against the best defence”, hence Dyna Hard’s roster having the punters for the Jags and Raiders. Which takes my two best options away here. The best option seems to be to hope that the Steelers used up most of their aerial attack last week, with the only person capable of doing anything in the air being P Brad Wing. Yep, a pun will work.

 

DT

The Rams OL managed to lose Scott Wells, Rodger Saffold and Jake Long to injury, moving Greg Robinson to LT. So its now weaker at 4 positions, and gave up a tonne of sacks last week anyway. Williams should be able to get a tackle for loss or two at a minimum.

 

DE

The logic above also holds for Ray McDonald of the 49ers. The Vikings OL isn’t great shakes either, and Jason Hatcher isn’t a bad bet to grab a sack.

 

LB

A theme is likely to emerge on this defence: some teams suck, lets hope they suck towards specific players. The Vikings aren’t very good, so Perry Riley isn’t a bad start. Bruce Irvin grabbed a couple of sacks against the Panthers last week on consecutive plays, and he gets to play against the Raiders this week. He should be able to grab one. The Bucs aren’t great, and Jabaal Sheard is due a sack or two, so maybe this is his week. And Vinny Rey is good for a big play every few weeks and gets to play the Jags, so a Bortles pick or fumble or whatever seems to be decent odds.

 

CB

1: Highlight “Bortles pick or fumble or whatever seems to be decent odds.” 2: CTRL+C. 3: CTRL+V. 4: Type Adam Jones. It’s extremely tempting to double down and pick one of Terence Newman or Leon Hall, but for the sake of variety lets remember that the Jets are playing and Sean Smith exists. He might have a decent chance at a pick if the Jets have a QB who can throw it close enough to him.

 

S

I have heard of Dashon Goldson and the Brian Hoyer train is slowly falling off the tracks, so he might have a chance to do something or other quite decent. Beyond that, safety options are very limited. And just in case Vick’s passes don’t get close enough to Sean Smith, lets give Husain Abdullah the chance to grab one or two.

Replacement Level: Week 7

After my second resounding Manboob victory of the season, Geoffrey has seen fit to leave me the replacements. So let’s start by “thanking” him with a review of how he did do and could have done:

    Proj Actual FA Rank Best Best Points
QB Stanton 4.28 0 7= Mike Glennon, TB 18.56
RB Rodgers 5.15 0.9 18 Fozzy Whittaker, CAR 11.6
RB Ogbannaya 3.5 0 28= Roy Helu, WAS 6.6
RB Robinson 2.825 3.6 7
WR Johnson, S 2.9 5.3 15 Andre Holmes, OAK 24.1
WR Wright 3.9 3.8 18 Robert Woods, BUF 15.8
WR Ginn Jr 2.2 2.375 25 Brandon Lloyd, SFO 14
WR LaFell 4.6 21.7 2* Chris Hogan, BUF 13.2
TE Carlson 4.4 1.4 14 James Casey, PHI 8.6
TE Lance Kendricks, STL 8.2
PK Cantazaro 6.4 10.45 1* Mike Nugent, CIN 9.7
PN Ryan 0 5.675 10 Steve Weatherford, NYG 12.425
 
DE Ngata 2 1.25 25= Vinny Curry, PHI 15
DE Gholston 1 4.5 10 George Johnson, DET 13.75
DT Guion 0.5 3 13= Evander Hood, JAC 13
LB Robinson 2.5 5 20* Tahir Whitehead, DET 26.95
LB Sheard 0 1 54= Dan Skuta, SFO 23.5
LB Durant 1.5 4 26= Justin Tuggle, HOU 16.05
LB Graham 1 19 3* Alex Okafor, ARI 16
S Ishmael 4 3 14= Rashad Johnson, ARI 38.8
S Jefferson 5.65 1 26= Dontae Johnson, SFO 20
CB Cox 0 6.25 12* Blidi Wreh-Wilson, TEN 22.65
CB Arrington 1.5 1.25 43* Buster Skrine, CLE 19.5
 
  59.805 104.45 367.985
 

 

 

Much like Bill Belichick Mangboob is a coach / GM, and much like Bill he spends a lot of time being grumpy in hoodies. This is not where the similarity ends, as both Bill and Manboob show a knack for coaching the shit out of his players, getting far more than the traditional 110% out of his players with an impressive 175% improvement. Unfortunately, also like Bill, Manboob is a terrible GM specialising in identifying players who have an awful lot of shit to be coached out, and the 104 he scored, while impressive against the predictions, was a long way short of the near 370 possible.

Overall Manboob finds himself coaching the Replacements to their second lowest score, and didn’t manage to beat a single proper team, leaving Pete’s week one effort still the best the Replacements have managed, and the only time the replacements have beaten a DynaBowl franchise.

    Proj Actual CtSOoT* Score Teams beaten
Week 1 Pete Conaghan 89.385 150.74 1.69 3
Week 2

Move along nothing to see here

Week 3 Ben Hendy 89.795 126.64 1.41 0
Week 4 James Goodson 52.4 97 1.85 0
Week 5 Iran Kulkowski 79.2 144.535 1.82 0
Week 6 Geoffrey Manboob 59.805 104.45 1.75 0
Week 7 David Slater 72.025

Anyway, enough trashing Manboob (power-ranked 10th out of 10 right now), it’s time to introduce Week 7’s replacements.*Coaching the Shit Out of Them

Ladies and gentlemen (well, just gentlemen) please could we have a tepid and disinterested round of applause for your offence!

Starting Quarterback – Charlie Whitehurst (Ten): Ranked 4th – Projected 9 points

This really comes down to a choice between 4 potential starters – Orton, Fitzpatrick, Genome Smith and Whitehurst.

Half man, half beard... ALL BEARD
Half man, half beard… ALL BEARD

Fitz may look like he’s eating a squirrel through his helmet grill, but he’s likely to be a liability against a Pittsburgh defence who have held opposing QBs to very low scores (joint 4th best in fantasy against QBs), and sadly doesn’t score any points for his squirrel-munching antics.

Orton is up against an even more effective Minnesota defence – 4th best in fantasy against QBs despite facing Matts Ryan and Stafford, Tom Fucking Brady, Adam Rodgers and Brees in 5 of their 6 weeks.

Genome, is facing the Patriots – better than both Pittsburgh and Minnesota in terms of destroying a QB’s fantasy totals – and he is a truly fucking terrible QB.

Seen here in court, yesterday
Seen here in court, yesterday

This leaves Whitehurst, who is playing Washington’s incredibly forgiving defence, a defence so bad it made King Cunt Nick Foles looks good. Also Charlie has magnificent hair. The only real risk is that Jake Locker is fit enough to play Sunday, but even if he is, it’s likely Whitehurst gets 2 quarters and he could still outscore the others in that time.

Starting Running Backs –

Roy Helu (Was): Ranked 1st – Projected 5.6pts

Jonathan Stewart (Car): Ranked 2nd – Projected 5.5pts

To say the running back options are thin would be an understatement. They’re anorexic, a graveyard of terrible selections.

Helu, who sees regular change of pace work in the Washington backfield is a steady option, and with a TD could put up a decent score.

The chaos in Carolina’s backfield means that the fit again Stewart (last week’s running back of the week in Carolina, Fozzy Whittaker, is questionable as is the week before’s Darrin Reaves) is likely to start and see the majority of carries when Cam doesn’t decide to do it all himself.

Starting Wide Receivers –

Andre Holmes (Oak): Ranked 3rd – Projected 5.4pts

Brandon Lloyd (SF): Ranked 27th – Projected 2.2pts

Jerricho Cotchery (Car): Ranked 4th – Projected 5.3pts

Robert Woods (Buf): Ranked 6th – Projected 4.525pts

Holmes is a no-brainer, and I’d be surprised if he were available for next week’s Replacement Level as he’s put up 13.4 and 24.1 points in the two games either side of the Raiders bye week with Carr starting to find his feet. Oakland has a good matchup this week, with Arizona having the most generous passing defence involved in this weekend’s games (31st in points to wide-receivers).

Lloyd has shown flashes of his old self, and knows Denver well, having been the NFL’s leading receiver in his time as a Bronco. A deep threat might prove necessary against a Denver defence which has been one of the best against opposing receivers.

Cotchery has been consistently average for Carolina so far, but with Benjamin suffering a mild concussion should see a greater workload this weekend. The Packers pass defence has been pretty good; holding opposing wideouts to less than the fantasy average, however this is as much a product of playing some average offences as anything else, and Miami lit them up for 156 receiving yards and 2 tds last week. Carolina is far from a dominant passing defence, but Green Bay has regularly demonstrated their difficulties handling a talented mobile QB and Cotchery could be the beneficiary.

Woods has emerged as a decent target for Orton and has seen a lot more looks in the passing game in recent weeks, unfortunately for the Bills, they’ve played a run of excellent defences over that period and that continues this week against the Vikes. 10 to 12 targets is a realistic number for Woods, and if he catches 7, he could find himself on the end of an 80 yard day, which would be good enough for my 4th choice.

Starting Tight Ends –

Jermaine Gresham (Cin): Ranked 2nd – Projected 4.5pts

Ben Watson (NOS): Ranked 13th – Projected 1.9pts

Ah, Jermaine Gresham… Sabotaging fantasy teams with his promise and and lack of production for about 5 years now. With the Bengals struggling for bodies who can catch passes Gresham had his best week of the year – in fact a better week than the whole year put together. Another 60+ yard outing beckons against Indy who’ve been generous to TEs so far this year.

With Jimmy Graham out, Watson is the usual number 2 tight end and should see a nice little uptick in his production. As a Jimmy Graham owner, I can testify first hand to how Drew Brees appears to have forgotten his Tight End exists so far this year, but at a thin position Watson has upside. Also, fuck you Drew Brees.

Starting Kicker –

Caleb Sturgis (Mia): Ranked joint 4th – Projected 6.4pts

A veritable treasure trove of riches at Kicker compared with the other offensive positions. Gould would be a fine choice, but Sturgis should get lots of opportunities to kick against a fairly poor Chicago defence, and has only missed once this year – from 48 yards.

Starting Punter –

Steve Weatherford (NYG): Ranked N/A – Projected 0pts

Not projecting points for punters is a major oversight by MFL. Weatherford is the second best punter so far amongst free agents, and he was the best in the league last year. His leg may be sore after last weekend, but he, unlike the rest of the Giants’ offence, could at least reflect on a job well done against Philly.

 

On to the defence… As a general rule, projected scores for defensive players are a joke. We’re dealing with big play scoring, and the league doesn’t seem to project big play scores, as such the projections are essentially useless as a guide here.

Starting Defensive Ends –

Haloti Ngata (Oak): Ranked 1st – Projected 2pts

George Johnson (Det): Ranked joint 38th – Projected 0pts

Ngata is a steady presence, with the potential for a big game, and his ability to make plays on passing downs matches up well against their pass happy offence.

Johnson is in good form, with 2.5 sacks and four tackles for a loss in his last two games. Dallas abused New Orleans’ offense, and Detroit bring a much better defensive unit to the game. Johnson can ride his hot-streak to make Drew Brees life slightly more miserable. Also, fuck you Drew Brees.

Starting Defensive Tackle –

Sammy Lee Hill (Ten): Ranked joint 25th – Projected 0pts

Tennessee have a good defence, tough, but not that special – that’s why their players litter the DynaBowl free agency pool. They also have the Washington Redskins in town, so expect to see a lot of them on my team this week.

Starting Linebackers –

Kamerion Wimbley (Ten): Ranked joint 31st – Projected 1pt

Pernell McPhee (Bal): Ranked joint 63rd – Projected 0pts

Eric Walden (Ind): Ranked joint 31st – Projected 1pt

Jabaal Sheard (Cle): Ranked joint 63rd – Projected 0pts

These are mostly match-up based. Tennessee and Washington, Baltimore and Atlanta (who are terrible on the road) and Cleveland and Jacksonville should provide plenty of opportunities for these guys to make plays. Indy play the Bengals, who’ve shown one of the better lines in the early stages of the season, but this is a trend thing. The Bengals line seems to be getting worse, and the Indy defence seems to be finding its feet. Walden has three sacks on the year and five tackles for a loss, I like him to have a good game.

Starting Safeties –

Michael Griffin (Ten): Ranked 2nd – Projected 5pts

Roman Harper (Car): Ranked 9th – Projected 3pts

Griffin is actually projected worse than his Tennessee safety colleague (15 points!), but has consistently out-performed him this year so far. Backing Kirk Cousins to throw stupid interceptions is basically playing with house money.

I was tempted to double down on Tennessee, but while Harper might be old, but he’s still pretty good in the passing game. The scoring we use doesn’t worry about players getting lit up, or defences who can’t stop their opponents – Green Bay figure to see a fair amount of the ball against Carolina, and Rodgers will make plays all day long, meaning at worst Harper should provide a reasonable return in tackles, defended passes and the like, with the potential for a big play along the way.

Starting Cornerbacks –

Adam Jones (Cin): Ranked 1st – Projected 5.2pts

Blidi Wreh-Wilson (Ten): Ranked joint 2nd – Projected 4pts

Jones plays in a good Cincy secondary who should get the chance to make plays against pass-happy Andy Luck, who rarely lets a game pass without one interception at least. Jones was also used as a returner last week, and that little point bump can only help.

Blidi Wreh-Wilson possesses an excellent name. He had a huge game against the Jags, and while it’s highly unlikely he’ll repeat that, Tennessee are playing the Redskins, and it could be jackpot time for anyone in that secondary. I’m also loathe to pick two players from the same club at corner or safety, else Newman would have been a good play here.

And so, without further ado, your full week 7 replacements (and the projected best replacements teams)

    Proj Rank among FA Best Best Points
QB Charlie Whitehurst, TEN 9 4 Kyle Orton, BUF 12.06
RB Roy Helu, WAS 5.6 1 Roy Helu, WAS 5.6
RB Jonathan Stewart, CAR 5.5 2 Jonathan Stewart, CAR 5.5
WR Andre Holmes, OAK 5.4 3 Andrew Hawkins, CLE 6.2
WR Brandon Lloyd, SFO 2.2 27 Jarius Wright, MIN 6.1
WR Jerricho Cotchery, CAR 5.3 4 Andre Holmes, OAK 5.4
WR Robert Woods, BUF 4.525 6 Jerricho Cotchery, CAR 5.3
TE Jermaine Gresham, CIN 4.5 2 Lance Kendricks, STL 9
TE Ben Watson, NOS 1.9 13 Jermaine Gresham, CIN 4.5
PK Caleb Sturgis, MIA 6.4 4= Robbie Gould, CHI 7.4
PN Steve Weatherford, NYG 0 N/A N/A 0
 
DE Haloti Ngata, BAL 2 1 Haloti Ngata, BAL 2
DE George Johson, DET 0 38= Osi Umenyiora, ATL 1
DT Ian Williams, SFO 0.5 7= Damon Harrison, NYJ 1
DT Sammie Lee Hill, TEN 0 25= Vince Wilfork, NEP 1
LB Kamerion Wimbley, TEN 1 31= Jacquian Williams, NYG 3
LB Pernell McPhee, BAL 0 63= Jon Beason, NYG 2.5
LB Eric Walden, IND 1 31= Philip Wheeler, MIA 2.5
LB Jabaal Sheard, CLE 0 63= Tahir Whitehead, DET 2.5
S Michael Griffin, TEN 5 2 George Wilson, TEN 15
S Roman Harper, CAR 3 9 Michael Griffin, TEN 5
CB Adam Jones, CIN 5.2 1 Adam Jones, CIN 5.2
CB Blidi Wreh-Wilson, TEN 4 2= Terence Newman, CIN 4
 
  72.025 111.76

 

I’d nominate manboob, for nominating me, but that seems like a vicious circle, and he’s already had his chance and blown it. So for next week I’d like to nominate manager of the Firebeards, Neil to see if he can’t beat his actual team’s score for the week.

Replacement Level: Week 5/6 Addendum

Geoffrey Manboob is a good man. And thorough. Well, not that thorough but he is busy, and I won’t have you holding that against him.

He missed a couple of things in his replacement level post this week and I am here to update those. Firstly, his own projected score, which is as follows:

PK Cantanzaro Ari 6.4
PN Ryan Seattle 0
QB Stanton Ari 4.28
RB Rodgers Atl 5.15
Ogbannaya Car 3.5
Robinson Jac 2.825
WR Johnson SF 2.9
Wright Min 3.9
Ginn Jnr Ari 2.2
LaFell NEP 4.6
TE Carlson Ari 4.4
DE Ngata Bal 2
Gholston TBB 1
DT Guion GBP 0.5
LB Robinson Was 2.5
Sheard Cle 0
Durant Dal 1.5
Graham Phi 1
S Ishmael Atl 4
Jefferson Ari 5.65
CB Cox SF 0
Arrington NEP 1.5
Total 59.805

 

Second of all, there’s the scoring of Iran’s team from week 5. Ian was projected a total of 79.2 points. According to his post. I do not know if this is true. But let’s see how his team actually wound up doing…

PK Bullock Hou 4
PN Schmidt Buf 10.125
QB Fitzpatrick Hou 4.46
RB Helu Was 5.8
Smith Atl 14.5
WR Austin Cle 5.4
Cotchery Car 4.6
Sanu Cin 13
Wright Min 2.7
TE Gresham Cin 1.5
Harbor Jac 2.2
DE Ayers NYG 1
Thornton Phi 12.5
DT Hankins NYG 16.5
LB Bostic Chi 1.5
Davis NYJ 2.75
Hawthorne NOS 2.25
Robinson Was 3
S Adams Ind 12.5
Moore Den 0.5
CB Allen Pit 19.5
Jackson Hou 4.25
Total 144.535

So there we go. He came out over 65 points better off. Well done Iran.